|
Grid Community Toolkit
6.2.1653033972 (tag: v6.2.20220524)
|
|
Grid Community Toolkit
6.2.1653033972 (tag: v6.2.20220524)
|
GridFTP: Protocol Extensions to FTP for the Grid
This section defines extensions to the FTP specification STD 9, RFC 959, FILE TRANSFER PROTOCOL (FTP) (October 1985) These extensions provide striped data transfer, parallel data transfer, extended data transfer, data buffer size configuration, and data channel authentication.
The following new commands are introduced in this specification
A new transfer mode (extended-block mode) is introduced for parallel and striped data transfers. Also, a set of extension options to RETR are added to control striped data layout and parallelism.
The following new feature names are to be included in the FTP server's response to FEAT if it implements the following sets of functionality
This extension is used to establish a vector of data socket listeners for for a server with one or more stripes. This command MUST be used in conjunction with the extended block mode. The response to this command includes a list of host and port addresses the server is listening on.
Due to the nature of the extended block mode protocol, SPAS must be used in conjunction with data transfer commands which receive data (such as STOR, ESTO, or APPE) and can not be used with commands which send data on the data channels.
The syntax of the SPAS command is:
The server-PI will respond to the SPAS command with a 229 reply giving the list of host-port strings for the remote server-DTP or user-DTP to connect to.
Where the command is correctly parsed, but the server-DTP cannot process the SPAS request, it must return the same error responses as the PASV command.
There are no options in this SPAS specification, and hence there is no OPTS command defined.
This extension is to be used as a complement to the SPAS command to implement striped third-party transfers. This command MUST always be used in conjunction with the extended block mode. The argument to SPOR is a vector of host/TCP listener port pairs to which the server is to connect. This
Due to the nature of the extended block mode protocol, SPOR must be used in conjunction with data transfer commands which send data (such as RETR, ERET, LIST, or NLST) and can not be used with commands which receive data on the data channels.
The syntax of the SPOR command is:
The host-port sequence in the command structure MUST match the host-port replies to a SPAS command.
The server-PI will respond to the SPOR command with the same response set as the PORT command described in the ftp specification.
There are no options in this SPOR specification, and hence there is no OPTS command defined.
The extended retrieve extension is used to request that a retrieve be done with some additional processing on the server. This command an extensible way of providing server-side data reduction or other modifications to the RETR command. This command is used in place of OPTS to the RETR command to allow server side processing to be done with a single round trip (one command sent to the server instead of two) for latency-critical applications.
ERET may be used with either the data transports defined in RFC 959, or using extended block mode as defined in this document. Using an ERET creates a new virtual file which will be sent, with it's own size and byte range starting at zero. Restart markers generated while processing an ERET are relative to the beginning of this view of the file.
The syntax of the ERET command is
The retrieve-mode defines behavior of the extended-retrieve mode. There is one mode defined by this specification, but other general purpose or application-specific ones may be added later.
The extended store extension is used to request that a store be done with some additional processing on the server. Arbitrary data processing algorithms may be added by defining additional ESTO store-modes. Similar to the ERET, the ESTO command expects data sent to satisfy the request to be sent as if it were a new file with data block offset 0 being beginning the beginning of the new file.
The format of the ESTO command is
The store-mode defines the behavior of the extended store. There is one mode defined by this specification, but others may be added later.
This extension adds the capability of a client to set the TCP buffer size for subsequent data connections to a value. This replaces the server-specific commands SITE RBUFSIZE, SITE RETRBUFSIZE, SITE RBUFSZ, SITE SBUFSIZE, SITE SBUFSZ, and SITE BUFSIZE. Clients may wish to consider supporting these other commands to ensure wider compatibility.
The syntax of the SBUF command is
The buffer-size value is the TCP buffer size in bytes. The TCP window size should be set accordingly by the server.
If the server-PI is able to set the buffer size state to the requested buffer-size, then it will return a 200 reply.
This extension provides a method for specifying the type of authentication to be performed on FTP data channels. This extension may only be used when the control connection was authenticated using RFC 2228 Security extensions.
The format of the DCAU command is
The default data channel authentication mode is A for FTP sessions which are RFC 2228 authenticated—the client must explicitly send a DCAU N message to disable it if it does not implement data channel authentication.
If the security handshake fails, the server should return the error response 432 (Data channel authentication failed).
The striped and parallel data transfer methods described above require an extended transfer mode to support out-of-sequence data delivery, and partial data transmission per data connection. The extended block mode described here extends the block mode header to provide support for these as well as large blocks, and end-of-data synchronization.
Clients indicate that they want to use extended block mode by sending the command
on the control channel before a transfer command is sent.
The structure of the extended block header is
The descriptor codes are indicated by bit flags in the descriptor byte. Six codes have been assigned, where each code number is the decimal value of the corresponding bit in the byte.
With this encoding, more than one descriptor coded condition may exist for a particular block. As many bits as necessary may be flagged.
Some additional protocol is added to the extended block mode data channels, to properly handle end-of-file detection in the presence of an unknown number of data streams.
Extended Block EOF Header
EOF Descriptor. The EOF header descriptor has the same definition as the regular data message header described above.
EOD Count Expected. This 64 bit field represents the total number of data connections that will be established with the server receiving the file. This number is used by the receiver to determine it has received all of the data. When the number of EOD messages received equals the number represented by the "EOD Count Expected" field the receiver has hit end of file.
Simply waiting for EOD on all open data connections is not sufficient. It is possible that the receiver reads an EOD message on all of its open data connects while an additional data connection is in flight. If the receiver were to assume it reached end of file it would fail to receive the data on the in flight connection.
To handle EOF in the multi-striped server case a 126 response has been introduced. When receiving data from a striped server a client makes a control connection to a single host, but several host may create several data connections back to the client. Each host can independently decide how many data connections it will use, but only a single EOF message may be sent to back to the client, therefore it must be possible to aggregate the total number of data connections used in the transfer across the stripes. The 126 response serves this purpose.
The 126 is an intermediate response to RETR command. It has the following format.
Several "Count of data connections" can be in a single reply. They correspond to the stripes returned in the response to the SPAS command.
Discussion of protocol change to enable bidirectional data channels brought up the following problem if doing bidirectional data channels
If the client is pasv, and sending to a multi-stripe server, then the server creates data connections connections; since the client didn't do SPAS, it cannot associate HOST/PORT pairs on the data connections with stripes on the server (it doesn't even know how many there are). it cannot reliably determine which nodes to send data to. (Becomes even more complex in the third-party transfer case, because the sender may have multiple stripes of data.) The basic problem is that we need to know logical stripe numbers to know where to send the data.
If you are in either striped or parallel mode, you will get exactly one EOF on each SPAS-specified ports (stripes). Hosts in extended block mode must be prepared to accept an arbitrary number of connections on each SPOR port before the EOF block is sent.
In general, opaque restart markers passed via the block header should not be used in extended block mode. Instead, the destination server should send extended data marker responses over the control connection, in the following form:
The byte ranges in the marker are an incremental set of byte ranges which have been stored to disk by the data server. The complete restart marker is a concatenation of all byte ranges received by the client in 111 responses.
The client MAY combine adjacent ranges received over several range responses into any number of ranges when sending the REST command to the server to restart a transfer.
For example, the client, on receiving the responses:
may send, equivalently,
to restart the transfer after those 90 bytes have been received.
The server MAY indicate that a given range of data has been received in multiple subsequent range markers. The client MUST be able to handle this. For example:
is equivalent to
Similarly, the client, if it is doing no processing of the restart markers, MAY send redundant information in a restart.
Should these be allowed as restart markers for stream mode?
In order to monitor the performance of extended block mode transfer, an additional preliminary reply MAY be transmitted over the control channel. This reply is of the form:
<timestamp> is seconds since the epoch
The performance marker can contain these or any other perf-line facts which provide useful information about the current performance.
All perf-line facts represent an instantaneous state of the transfer at the given timestamp. The meaning of the facts are
A transfer start time can be specified by a perf marker with 'Stripe Bytes Transferred' set to zero. Only the first marker per stripe can be used to specify the start time of that stripe. Any subsequent markers with 'Stripe Bytes Transferred' set to zero simply indicates no data transfer over the interval.
A server should send a 'start' marker for each stripe. A server should also send a final perf marker for each stripe. This is a marker with 'Stripe Bytes Transferred' set to the total transfer size for that stripe.
The options described in this section provide a means to convey striping and transfer parallelism information to the server-DTP. For the RETR command, the Client-FTP may specify a parallelism and striping mode it wishes the server-DTP to use. These options are only used by the server-DTP if the retrieve operation is done in extended block mode. These options are implemented as RFC 2389 extensions.
The format of the RETR OPTS is specified by:
The layout option is used by the source data node to send sections of the data file to the appropriate destination stripe. The various StripeLayout parameters are to be implemented as follows:
The parallelism option is used by the source data node to control how many parallel data connections may be established to each destination data node. This extension option provides for both a fixed level of parallelism, and for adapting the parallelism to the host/network connection, within a range. If the starting-parallelism option is set, then the server-DTP will make starting-parallelism connections to each destination data node. If the minimum-parallelism option is set, then the server may reduce the number of parallel connections per destination data node to this value. If the maximum-parallelism option is set, then the server may increase the number of parallel connections to per destination data node to at most this value.
[1] Postel, J. and Reynolds, J., "<a href="ftp://ftp.isi.edu/in-notes/rfc959.txt"> FILE TRANSFER PROTOCOL (FTP)</a>", STD 9, RFC 959, October 1985.
[2] Hethmon, P. and Elz, R., "<a href="ftp://ftp.isi.edu/in-notes/rfc2389.txt"> Feature negotiation mechanism for the File Transfer Protocol</a>", RFC 2389, August 1998.
[3] Horowitz, M. and Lunt, S., "<a href="ftp://ftp.isi.edu/in-notes/rfc2228.txt"> FTP Security Extensions</a>", RFC 2228, October 1997.
[4] Elz, R. and Hethom, P., "<a href="http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-ftpext-mlst-13.txt"> FTP Extensions</a>", IETF Draft, May 2001.
There are several security components in this document which are extensions to the behavior of RFC 2228. These appendix attempts to clarify the protocol how these extensions map to the OpenSSL-based implementation of the GSSAPI known as GSI (Grid Security Infrastructure).
A client implementation which communicates with a server which supports the DCAU extension should delegate a limited credential set (using the GSS_C_DELEG_FLAG and GSS_C_GLOBUS_LIMITED_DELEG_PROXY_FLAG flags to gss_init_sec_context()). If delegation is not performed, the client MUST request that DCAU be disable by requesting DCAU N, or the server will be unable to perform the default of DCAU A as described by this document.
When DCAU mode "A" or "S" is used, a separate security context is established on each data channel. The context is established by performing the GSSAPI handshake with the active-DTP calling gss_init_sec_context() and the passive-DTP calling gss_accept_sec_context(). No delegation need be done on these data channels.
Data channel protection via the PROT command MUST always be used in conjunction with the DCAU A or DCAU S commands. If a PROT level is set, then messages will be wrapped according to RFC 2228 Appendix I using the contexts established on each data channel. Tokens transferred over the data channels when either PROT or DCAU is used are not framed in any way when using GSI. (When implementing this specification with other GSSAPI mechanisms, a 4 byte, big endian, binary token length should proceed all tokens).
If the DCAU mode or the PROT mode is changed between file transfers when caching data channels in extended block mode, all open data channels must be closed. This is because the GSI implementation does not support changing levels of protection on an existing connection.
1.8.5
